Web applications built to run your business.

It depends on scope, but you are not left guessing: after a short discovery call, usually under an hour, we give you a fixed price in writing so there are no surprises once work is underway. Work is billed in two-week increments you can see and steer, and if scope needs to change partway through, you hear about the cost before we build it, not after. For a rough ballpark before we even talk, try our free cost calculator: it walks you through project type, complexity and features and gives you an instant price range and timeline. As a general shape, a standard custom web application with authentication, a database and a handful of core workflows typically lands in the low-to-mid five figures and takes eight to twelve weeks, though simpler internal tools can be faster and more complex platforms with heavy integrations take longer. The discovery call turns that range into a real number.

You get a working demo at the end of every two-week sprint, not a status report, and most web applications reach a usable first release within a couple of months depending on scope. We deliberately build the core workflow first, the thing your users actually need to do, so real value ships early rather than being held back until everything is polished. By sprint two or three you are typically clicking through something that resembles the finished product, even if secondary features are still coming. For a simple internal tool this can mean a usable version in four to six weeks; for a more complex customer-facing platform with several user roles and integrations, expect closer to ten to fourteen weeks. Either way, you never go more than two weeks without seeing tangible progress you can test yourself, which is what lets us catch misunderstandings early instead of at the end.

Yes, completely, with nothing held back. You get the repository, the CI/CD pipeline, the hosting configuration and the documentation from day one, all in accounts you control rather than ours. There is no lock-in and no proprietary layer or framework you are quietly dependent on that only we can maintain. If you want to move the project to an in-house team, hire a different agency, or just want an independent audit of the code, you are free to do any of those without needing our sign-off or paying anything extra to leave. This matters more than it sounds: plenty of agencies keep just enough control, an account only they can access, a deploy process only they understand, that switching away becomes painful on purpose. We do the opposite deliberately, because we would rather earn a long relationship on the quality of the work than on how expensive it is to walk away.

Yes, and this is a substantial part of what we do. We regularly pick up applications that have slowed down, lost their original development team, or simply stopped moving forward, and get them back on track. The first step is always a short technical audit, usually a few days, where we read the existing codebase, check test coverage and deployment setup, and tell you honestly what state it is actually in before proposing anything. From there we stabilise what is fragile, fix the most urgent bugs, and then modernise in stages rather than attempting a risky big-bang rewrite that pauses feature work for months. This staged approach means your product keeps shipping and users see continuous improvement, rather than silence while we rebuild everything behind the scenes. If priorities change halfway through, you are never left with a half-finished rewrite and no working product.