SaaS products built to onboard, bill and scale from day one.

It depends on how much of the foundation, multi-tenancy, billing, permissions, you need built from scratch, but you get a fixed price in writing after a short discovery call, so there is no open-ended hourly meter running. For a rough ballpark before we talk, try our free cost calculator: pick SaaS as your project type and it returns an instant price range and timeline based on your feature set. As a general shape, a SaaS MVP with authentication, one subscription tier and a core workflow typically lands in the low-to-mid five figures and takes ten to fourteen weeks; multi-tenant platforms with usage-based billing and several user roles take longer. The discovery call turns that range into a firm number for your specific scope.

Most SaaS MVPs reach a usable first release in ten to fourteen weeks, with a working demo at the end of every two-week sprint so you are never guessing at progress. We build the core workflow and billing first, the thing a paying customer actually needs on day one, rather than polishing secondary features before the product can take a single subscription. A narrower MVP focused on one workflow and one pricing tier can move faster; a platform with multiple user roles, usage-based billing and heavier integrations runs longer. Either way, you see something you can click through and test within the first two weeks, not months into the engagement.

Yes, and we treat this as a foundational decision rather than something to bolt on once you have real customers. We design data isolation, tenancy boundaries and organisation-level permissions into the schema and the application layer from the first sprint, because retrofitting proper tenancy into a single-tenant codebase later is significantly more expensive than building it correctly once. That said, we scope the level of isolation to what you actually need: a simpler shared-schema approach for most B2B SaaS products, or stricter database-per-tenant isolation where compliance or scale genuinely demands it. We explain the trade-off plainly during discovery rather than defaulting to whichever is easiest for us to build.

Yes, entirely. The repository, the CI/CD pipeline, the cloud infrastructure and the billing integration are set up in accounts you control from day one, not ours with you as a guest. There is no lock-in and no proprietary layer that only we can maintain. If you want to bring development in-house, hire a different team, or just want an independent audit of the codebase, you can do any of those without our sign-off. This matters especially for SaaS products, where the business and the codebase tend to grow together for years; you should never be stuck with an agency because leaving would mean losing access to your own platform.